@ThePlumLineGS Disagree based on multiple interviews, etc. I'm hardly saying their arguments are bulletproof. But they are serous
-
-
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker Calling it "Obama's" deal is inherently unserious.1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS Disagree. Its politics but not unserious.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker It is fundamentally an effort to dodge grappling with what pulling out of the deal would mean to allies.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
-
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker Calling it "Obama's" deal airbrushes out of the picture the fact that it was negoiated by multiple world powers.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS ...That point is debatable but perfectly acceptable politics.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker That's valid. I'm saying there is also a substantive underlying point that he's making, and that it's dubious and a dodge.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS We disagree on this but it's not an unacceptable challenge on your part - we just see differently2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker@ThePlumLineGS Well I follow both of you so try and remain friends though you may disagree.#OnlyTwoReportersWorthReading1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@energydonk @ThePlumLineGS Not to worry. We've carved out a niche.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.