Agreed w/ this re: King v Burwell. Don't think it applies to #IranDealhttps://twitter.com/ThePlumLineGS/status/623086106398072832 …
-
-
@DavidMDrucker ...then they get to campaign on undoing the deal in 2016 (I think that's a loser in general elex, but Rs don't) -
@ThePlumLineGS Think we agree on basically most things except how this plays in general. I think it's a winning issue, or if not, neutral. -
@DavidMDrucker the polls suggest otherwise, and I would remind you that Obama and McCain battled over this in 2008 -
@ThePlumLineGS Polls have shown support for talks & no trust in Iran. Now that you have deal, it's a new debate. Key is Iran's behavior. -
@DavidMDrucker I agree with that, but there is no reason to presume at the outset that the debate favors Rs -
@ThePlumLineGS If one assumes Iran will continue to misbehave, I think it's a fair assumption to make. Could be wrong but fair projection -
@DavidMDrucker sure, it's possible -
@ThePlumLineGS Another successfully civil, high brow twitter discussion. :) - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@DavidMDrucker Right. And this is the best political outcome for Rs: Force Obama to veto and then fail to override -
@ThePlumLineGS Politically, might be. But I think successful override (that won't happen) would also be good political outcome. -
@DavidMDrucker Then Rs own all the consequences that follow from that
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.