@DavidMDrucker Ironic. First ruling called it a tax despite intentions for it not to be. Second ruling ignored the text in favor of intent.
-
-
-
@DaveWright1968@DavidMDrucker it's GOPs fault, they had 5 yrs to come up with Replace, they failed Roberts wl not do their wrk 4 them
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DavidMDrucker they ruled Congress had authority to enact the ACA under the power to tax in Sebellius, rather than the commerce clause.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DavidMDrucker@ChrisStirewalt REPEAL, REPEAL, REPEAL. Only way to take us back to the constitution since Roberts ignores it. All politicsThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DavidMDrucker@ChrisStirewalt Now absolutely must REPEAL. Ruling doesnt make sense. How is wording ambiguous? Can Roberts be impeached?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DavidMDrucker@NolteNC Obama must have some real dirt on Justice Roberts...rule in my favor... Or else#WakeupAmericaThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.