Politics aside, it's defensible to 1) Support Iraq war based on initial intel 2) Oppose based on real intel 3) Think world btr w/out Saddam
-
-
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker but if you can’t explain how to rebuild things given the longstanding historical factionalism in Iraq, the last pt is dubious1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @brianros1
@brianros1 Disagree. … But my point is, it's a defensible position, not that it's the only or right position. Saddam was a bad actor.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker I mean, I supported it at the time for that reason. I was wrong. Doing an outside field for my doctorate on Middle East3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @brianros1
@brianros1 It's also defensible to say we were better off w/ the devil we had. But it wasn't hunky dory...
10:38 AM - 14 May 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.