if Rubio is such abrilliant strategist, why have his numbers tanked? http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2016-national-gop-primary … cc @HotlineJosh
-
-
Replying to @HotlineJosh
@HotlineJosh which was neither the work of a 'good strategist' or a 'statesman.'1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HotlineJosh
@MikeCzin also think the focus on middle class issues the smart move... but obv won't be reflected in early WH '16 polls1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HotlineJosh
@HotlineJosh@MikeCzin If presidential polls this early mattered Obama would probably be a second term senator.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker@HotlineJosh Yes, but Josh's column was specifically about how adept Rubio is at reading the electorate.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MikeCzin
@MikeCzin@DavidMDrucker he is, but the problem is that voters are unusually fickle these days. Principle > politics could pay off..1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HotlineJosh
@HotlineJosh@DavidMDrucker it's not the voters are feckless - Rubio is. Made that clear when he walked away from CIR.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@MikeCzin @HotlineJosh Rubio might or might not B major player in 16. But I'll stick with JK. Generally impeccable timing & political sense
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.