Seriously, are people demanding that Gillibrand name names because they don't believe her? @BenjySarlin @aburnspolitico @nickconfessore
-
-
Replying to @joanwalsh
@joanwalsh@BenjySarlin@nickconfessore Not what either Nick or I said, Joan. Obviously. Jesus.2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @alexburnsNYT
@aburnspolitico@nickconfessore Maybe she doesn't think it would best serve her constituents to out colleagues vs. acknoweldge experience3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BenjySarlin
@BenjySarlin@aburnspolitico@nickconfessore how about the constituents of the men who said those things? do they deserve to know?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeSherman
@JakeSherman@aburnspolitico@nickconfessore "Deserve" is the key. Are we better served not hearing people bring this up at all?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BenjySarlin
@JakeSherman@aburnspolitico@nickconfessore Because if she names people it suddenly defines her entire job in the Senate from hereon in1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BenjySarlin
@BenjySarlin@JakeSherman@nickconfessore You seem to proceed from the assumption that wanting the names is an attack on Gillibrand. False.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexburnsNYT
@aburnspolitico@JakeSherman@nickconfessore Not an "attack" necessarily, but certainly putting the onus on her.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BenjySarlin
@aburnspolitico@JakeSherman@nickconfessore Especially since story is about an environment, not really about individual bad actors2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BenjySarlin
@BenjySarlin@JakeSherman@nickconfessore Think it's about both. Environment changes when individual actors are held accountable.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@aburnspolitico @BenjySarlin @JakeSherman @nickconfessore After all this, some reporter is going to poll every male senator on this Q.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.