@DavidMDrucker Why would that number be any different than the outcome in a world where you can filibuster?
-
-
-
@HotlineScott Because they would feel some responsibility to govern and appear reasonable. Now will be all about retribution. -
@DavidMDrucker That's fair. The same factors motivating them to govern & appear reasonable would exist though, esp for those up in 2016. -
@HotlineScott But now we've introduced an emotional barrier and something for base to grab onto. Blows it up. -
@DavidMDrucker@HotlineScott Base will demand a pound (or twenty) of flesh. Rejecting all O's nominees if they win '14 an easy way to do it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DavidMDrucker Shameless self-promotion here, but:https://twitter.com/GWhistorian/status/403699055647555584 … -
@GWhistorian good stuff
-
@DavidMDrucker Seemed pretty obvious. Figured others would've cottoned on. By far easiest way for GOP to retaliate if they take Senate.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DavidMDrucker is it close to the same amount GOP allowing now?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DavidMDrucker Impeachment proceedings are pointless without the Senate, but it’s pretty easy with it. Obama’s done far worse than NixonThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DavidMDrucker but first you have to stop being the stupid party.... So mehThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.