NYT says nuclear option doesn't impact SCOTUS nominees. Of course it does. Stupid reporter or just propaganda?http://nyti.ms/17Qwxdy
-
-
Replying to @hughhewitt
@hughhewitt@jwpetersNYT I think the proposal carves that out1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JRubinBlogger
@JRubinBlogger@jwpetersNYT Proposal doesn't matter. Device used to change rules is the nuke. Same in '05. Once used, can't banish it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hughhewitt
@hughhewitt@jwpetersNYT well if the facts don't matter then whatever.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JRubinBlogger
@JRubinBlogger@jwpetersNYT Facts do matter. Fact is Reid is using the nuke option, and once used for 1 judicial nominee can be used 4 any2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @hughhewitt
@hughhewitt@jwpetersNYT not by this proposal. I think you have better arguments without making an argument like the gun registry myth.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@JRubinBlogger @hughhewitt @jwpetersNYT Have to side w/ HH on this one. Once #nukeption invoked on one judge, the precedent will carry over.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.