Guys, as @toddzwillich points out the clean CR remains available after Senate tables the 2 amdts. Such motions arent debatable
-
-
Replying to @APAndrewTaylor
@APAndrewTaylor@nielslesniewski@toddzwillich But what about proceeding to and getting on the bill? Will that require cloture?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @penwhen
@penwhen@APAndrewTaylor@nielslesniewski House message. Nope. Not debatable.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @toddzwillich
@toddzwillich@APAndrewTaylor admittedly, I'm not at the Capitol so I don't know how the idea Reid would need 60 for this got started.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nielslesniewski
@nielslesniewski@toddzwillich@APAndrewTaylor if he killed it w a budget point of order - 60 votes1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ahrferrier
@ahrferrier@nielslesniewski@APAndrewTaylor as I understand it, tabling the 2 amdts is all that's required to leave CR hanging out there1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @toddzwillich
@toddzwillich@ahrferrier@nielslesniewski AMENDING requires 60. Tabling the amdts won't. And they think they can do it in 1 vote1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @APAndrewTaylor
@APAndrewTaylor@toddzwillich@ahrferrier you can table a motion to concur in House amendments (plural)2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes
@nielslesniewski Saw all tweets, but can you explain:Reid can table House amendments to CR (51s) & then mssg it back to House w/out a vote?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.