@ThePlumLineGS What is that cover?
-
-
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker if Cordray and NLRB were let through I assume threat would go away for now2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS@DavidMDrucker expect same re: judicial nominees whenever GOP takes over Senate; assume u switch sides on issue again tho1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SquitoSnark
@polisnark1986
@DavidMDrucker meh. judicial noms different. I would oppose Ds holding up exec noms explicitly to stop govt from working2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS @polisnark1986 Of course "stop govt frm working" is subjective. They would argue it's about it abt policy/advise consent2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker @polisnark1986 GOP blockade of Cordray is explicitly about getting dramatic changes to the *agency*2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS @polisnark1986 What I did was present the argument. They'd probably pass a lie detector test, fwiw. These things subjective1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker @polisnark1986 my point is that the GOP's public explicit reason for blocking Cordray is wanting changes to the agency itself2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS @polisnark1986 Right; that's pretty standard stuff, historically. Infuriating, no doubt & I'm neither defending/advocating.4 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker careful, or@jbplainblog will come after you2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@ThePlumLineGS @jbplainblog Can't we all just get along?
-
-
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker@jbplainblog heh. okay. but only because it's Friday. :)0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.