If Congress doesn't write legislation precisely (which, yes, means, many words) then a Judge will fill in the gaps. Does folks prefer that?
-
-
Replying to @chucktodd
@chucktodd I agree w/ you on the merits, but this is what happens when people lose faith in the process.8 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker fair enough, but simple language will only lead to judicial activism4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chucktodd
Isn't it the press's job to hold these official accountable for writing bad bills or not reading them?
@chucktodd@DavidMDrucker1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @FngConservative
@FngConservative@chucktodd Actually, it's up to the voters to decide what's good or bad. We're suppose to report the news for you to decide3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
So what you're saying is that you're not there to quiz officials about govt functions just pass on info?
@DavidMDrucker@chucktodd1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FngConservative
@FngConservative@chucktodd No. We're here to find out what's going on. But your job to act on it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
What about the overwhelming criticism of the Tea party? They acted on news & get pummeled for it by the press?
@DavidMDrucker@chucktodd1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@FngConservative Not defending that.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.