Sen @GrahamBlog disputes Sen Durbin claim Gang of 8 agreed to "de-link" citizenship path & border security trig's: http://washingtonexaminer.com/dick-durbin-says-border-security-no-longer-linked-to-citizenship/article/2531727 …
-
-
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@davidmdrucker Not sure issue is whether Gang 'agreed' to de-link. Issue is what is black-and-white language of bill. Probably favors Durbin2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ByronYork
@ByronYork@DavidMDrucker um no. Cornyn amendment uses exact same language S.744 does on purpose. cship and security triggers are =ly linked1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @conncarroll
@ByronYork@DavidMDrucker that said, the trigger details are different. but the language linking the triggers to the path is the exact same.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @conncarroll
@conncarroll@ByronYork@DavidMDrucker someone seriously needs to define what is meant by "link" here.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS@conncarroll@ByronYork "Link" = the path only happens if security directives verified as occurred or in process of occurring1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker@conncarroll@ByronYork "in process" is not as hard a trigger as in the Cornyn amendment1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@ThePlumLineGS Might be case. I was explaining my interp of Gang bill in current form. Makes sense - that's why Rs want to beef up.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.