Cornyn amendment looks like something Dems can agree to. except for oath wrinkle, no real change. http://bit.ly/13CkcI2#.UbiD1UYE2DA.twitter …
-
-
Replying to @conncarroll
.
@conncarroll So far Dems are calling@JohnCornyn amendment "dead in the water." So far, anyway.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker@conncarroll it's unclear to me how Ds can support anything that requires trigger before citizenship2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS@DavidMDrucker current bill already requires completion of security measures, Cornyn wrinkle is doing so under oath.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @conncarroll
@conncarroll@DavidMDrucker but current bill doesn't allow for nixing of citizenship path if metrics aren't met1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThePlumLineGS
@ThePlumLineGS@DavidMDrucker both bills don't allow green card issuance unless DHS sec certifies security completed, right?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @conncarroll
@conncarroll@DavidMDrucker there appear to be varying interpretations of the gang of eight bill2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker@conncarroll right. my understanding is Rs want border security trigger hardened precisely b/c it's unclear1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@ThePlumLineGS @conncarroll And cuz they'll get nailed if security directives never pan out. Lot of these guys want stay in Congress.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.