Cornyn amendment looks like something Dems can agree to. except for oath wrinkle, no real change. http://bit.ly/13CkcI2#.UbiD1UYE2DA.twitter …
.@conncarroll So far Dems are calling @JohnCornyn amendment "dead in the water." So far, anyway.
-
-
@DavidMDrucker@JohnCornyn the actual language is 5 seconds old!!! -
speed readers or wishful thinking? “
@conncarroll:@DavidMDrucker@JohnCornyn the actual language is 5 seconds old!!!” -
.
@JohnCornyn .@conncarroll Based on the outline as first reported last week. -
@DavidMDrucker@JohnCornyn that outline sounded much tougher than actual language. I've seen nothing yet that substantively impedes cship -
@conncarroll@DavidMDrucker it does have Comptroller certification, as we said it would. (p. 9) -
@DBrandewie do you have link? - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DavidMDrucker@conncarroll it's unclear to me how Ds can support anything that requires trigger before citizenship -
@ThePlumLineGS@DavidMDrucker current bill already requires completion of security measures, Cornyn wrinkle is doing so under oath. -
@conncarroll@DavidMDrucker but current bill doesn't allow for nixing of citizenship path if metrics aren't met -
@ThePlumLineGS@DavidMDrucker both bills don't allow green card issuance unless DHS sec certifies security completed, right? -
@conncarroll@ThePlumLineGS@DavidMDrucker S744 requires DHS certify border/fence plans "substantially" completd b4 greencard. Big fudgeword -
@kausmickey@conncarroll@DavidMDrucker not a trigger in any sense, right? -
@ThePlumLineGS@kausmickey@DavidMDrucker I have a clear side by side comparison coming soon. -
@conncarroll@kausmickey@DavidMDrucker as I understand it, DHS simply has to certify that the border plan is "substantially deployed" - 22 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.