@ThePlumLineGS @conncarroll It will never happen. Ever. But Conn is right, there's probably some concern there.
@ThePlumLineGS @conncarroll But doing it that way defeats the purpose, politically. And there's too much natural self-interest involved.
-
-
@DavidMDrucker@ThePlumLineGS@conncarroll so there's no way w/, say, citizenship+stringent Cong-controlled trigger, to get 120Rs and 100Ds? -
@JeffSmithMO@DavidMDrucker@ThePlumLineGS Dems would never agree to Cong-controlled trigger -
@conncarroll@DavidMDrucker@ThePlumLineGS why are Dems so fixated on admin-controlled trigger when odds of future Dem WH are 50-50? -
@JeffSmithMO@DavidMDrucker@ThePlumLineGS they're already planning Hilary's inauguration -
@conncarroll@DavidMDrucker@ThePlumLineGS lol. Absurd. She's peaked. And it'll have more to do w/ GDP growth anyway. -
@JeffSmithMO@conncarroll@ThePlumLineGS If Dems think they can squeeze Repubs & they'll vote on this for the politics, they're wrong. -
@DavidMDrucker@JeffSmithMO@conncarroll I think the dynamic is simpler. Ds won't agree to anything that undermines path to citizenship -
@ThePlumLineGS@DavidMDrucker@JeffSmithMO yes. that is their holy grail here: an unimpeded path to citizenship.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.