Did Marco Rubio really come to Washington to help pass thousand page bills drafted in secret? I don't think so.
-
-
Replying to @bdomenech
@bdomenech Not commenting on policy of the bill, but what do you mean "drafted in secret"? Bills are never drafted in public. Are they?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker Referring to "who was cutting the deal" queries from floor. Similar to PPACA. http://vlt.tc/wd11 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bdomenech
@bdomenech 10-4. FWIW, I think it's a specious argument, though a popular one when one opposes a particular bill, for several reasons.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker A fair point, but I think the issue here is stakeholders cutting deals in massive pieces of legislation, which is not new.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bdomenech
@bdomenech@bdomenech No. But really no other way. To not consult stakeholders is a recipe for failure. What matters is bill substance...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker What the people find revolting generally is the idea that they are not stakeholders.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bdomenech
@bdomenech That's understandable.Except they are-they are represented by various stakeholders (in theory.) And they vote. We've seen it work1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker For some, but I don't think many feel they have a seat at the table - Chamber not an avatar, etc. Certainly didn't with ACA.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@bdomenech No argument. ACA in particular was very politically one-sided.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.