@DeeinColumbiaMD Interference is a broad term. There's running the place and there's using the IRS to target enemies, as Nixon did.
-
-
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker After Nixon Congress outlawed involvement in operations from outside of the agency & PBO has yet 2 make any pol appts 2 IRS!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DeeinColumbiaMD
@DeeinColumbiaMD So if the IRS decides to target people, there's nothing that can be done? Is that you're argument? Not accountable?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker First of all stick 2 the facts, the IG report plainly states these groups weren't targeted. Hyperbole is not an argument.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DeeinColumbiaMD
@DeeinColumbiaMD The IG did not say that. The IG report uses the word "targeting" and George has said they might yet find political motives.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker The point os this began with 1 employee inundated w/request using inappropriate key words 4 their search.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DeeinColumbiaMD
@DeeinColumbiaMD I'm drawing no conclusions until I know who & hear what they say. But often this results from a permissible culture.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker The problem is u've already jumped 2 several conclusions that incl the PBO admin shld've have known about this.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DeeinColumbiaMD
@DeeinColumbiaMD Yes, the admin should have known. Not interfered w/ IG audit, but known about it3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker Info about an audit taking place has been online since last October. I think w/everything on PBOs plate this doesn't rank.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@DeeinColumbiaMD We agree to disagree. Back at ya later.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.