If media were concerned abt what was in the immigration bill instead of obsessing over whether it can pass, we'd be having a better debate
-
-
-
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
.
@DavidMDrucker It's not about what's in the bill. Just who is for it, who is against it, and whether it will pass.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SenLeeComs
@SenLeeComs I think it's about all of that - and all of that is rather relevant. Issues alone don't determine viability....2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
.
@DavidMDrucker So much of what pro-bill voices said abt the bill is turning out to be false or misleading. Isn't that a story?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SenLeeComs
@SenLeeComs I think that's your interpretation of the story and it's one angle. There are other angles & many facets to this.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
.
@DavidMDrucker True. Which is my point: the preoccupation with ONE angle. It's all "can it pass?" instead of "should it pass?".1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SenLeeComs
@SenLeeComs The "should" belongs on the Ed Pages. I'm not in the business of advocating.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker Fair. How about just explaining what the bill says and whether that matches up with what the pro-bill talking points say?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@SenLeeComs Nothing wrong w/ your last suggestion. Both sides accuse press of failing to do this, FWIW. But we are supposed to do that.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.