So Saxby was more conservative than Inhofe but Saxby was seen as vulnerable to a conserv primary challenge. http://www.nationaljournal.com/2012-voting-ratings/the-senate-s-most-conservative-member-ever-heard-of-him-20130220?print=true …
-
-
Replying to @chucktodd
@chucktodd Tone matters much 4 conserve activists.Putting up visible fights,as Inhofe does,is valued.Chambliss' conciliatory style disliked1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker@chucktodd a 14-pt gap favoring Inhofe on@heritage_action's scorecard; plus, he didn't participate in gang or talk tax hikes2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danholler
@danholler Partly makes my point. He didn't participate in Gang. Inhofe is a big earmarker and railed against earmark ban.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker tone--a willingness to fight--is important, but you cannot chalk up the differing perceptions b/w them to merely tone.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danholler
@danholler I'm not going to argue your own score card. But I'll keep disagreeing on the importance of tone these days w/ activists.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
@DavidMDrucker I suspect our test will be Lindsey Graham, won't it?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.