Again, you aren't explaining anything. How do you mean "involved"? How is he involved.. by commenting on it? That certainly isn't the context that could be gathered from the original post, and rather silly in the context you have now given. /1
-
-
-
David is being perfectly clear. If the country is blaming Trump for the event he acts differently than if they don't. Media has constantly pushed "this is because of Trump's rhetoric". Thus, he is "blamed" (or involved or implicated). Use your brain for me one time Joe.
-
Also, might want to check the definition of "implicated", chief.
-
Very cute when a dummy attempts to condescend to a much smarter person.
-
Appreciate your feed back. I’m fine with analysis I tweeted & think it was clear but understand some might disagree; always glad to hear from critics. Involved/implicated meant when there are suggestions (or accusations) that he is partially (or more) responsible.
-
It was definitely clear David. Some people will deliberately twist an argument just to be pedantic. Ignore Joe.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
When you have 90% of the biased hostile media/Democrats calling him and his family traitors, Nazis, racists, need I go on and there is violence towards his cabinet, his supporters and his family the media rarely gives ANY coverage to that & of course takes no blame, but if ANYONE
-
on the right does ANYTHING towards people on the left Trump is to blame. It happens every single time. How would you react if you’re being blamed for freaking bombs being sent to so many people when the people blaming him have ZERO evidence who this is or why they did it?
-
The Scalise shooting was out of the news in 3 days. The suspected ricin sent to him and his cabinet earlier this month was barely even covered. The NYT just posed a fictional story about the Secret Service ASSASSINATING him in their paper. In what world is it ok for the media to
-
to do that? Would the Washington Examiner EVER post something like about a Democratic President? Hell no they wouldn’t. Yet here is the “paper of record” printing assassination porn of murdering OUR President. So stop insinuating he is in an way responsible for this. He isn’t.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And, of course, CNN shoulders not blame and has been a beacon of clarity in all things moral. That is when they are not apologizing for "mistakes" in their "reporting".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can you name me a case where Dems / Media did not implicate Trump in an event? You say contrast w/mass shootings, yet media jump directly to Gun control and blame Trump + NRA?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
implicate verb im·pli·cate | \ˈim-plə-ˌkāt \ 3a : to bring into intimate or incriminating connection Ex: evidence that implicates him in the bombing (Ex theirs) https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/implicate … Pundits are attributing bombs to Trump’s rhetoric. There is no evidence which implicates him.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I feel like the word you are looking for is complicit. Not implicated.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only if they are not white, only sometimes blames the perps if they are white.
-
Examples?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.