To do that you need at least one small government party. Good luck. =>https://twitter.com/nedryun/status/1043158157827219457 …
-
-
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
A) the government can spend a lot of money without directly employing a lot of people. B) the pre-Trump party (think Bush 1 & 2) weren't exactly small government types either. C) Trade protection & cuts to immigration doesn't necessitate higher gov spending.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MatthewMGlynn
I don't think it's that simple. But my main point is that there is not currently a political party that believes in small gov't. There's a party that believes in tax cuts & de-reg, but not reducing the size of govt & relegating things to the states.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidMDrucker
I'm not sure how true that is. I just don't think there is a presidential election majority for that agenda. But that agenda still has sway with congressional Rs. If they want to implement it they should try winning over the electorate by talking to voters. They have a platform.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Fair points. Def few Americans interested in this agenda, which impacts the parties.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.