Guess what? Voters are pretty sophisticated and most that I interview talk in actual complete sentences. It's amazing the quotes I get if I pound the pavement and ask enough questions of enough voters.
No, the argument is that these quotes are too perfect so they must be fabricated create a manufactured narrative. And my point is, actually these voters are out there.
-
-
But it's not about them speaking in complete sentences. It's not about syntax. It's about the content.
-
Also dude, no one is saying these voters aren't out there, not in the abstract. But these people did not say these things
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
For example, like when we hear a quote from an anonymous White House source that uses the term "straight out of central casting" ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They're not "too perfect" - its' that they use specific language and terms that JUST SO HAPPEN to be popular with Zito or co-authors when speaking themselves. You really don't find that the least bit suspicious? Shouldn't readers be skeptical of things like that?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.