Disagree w/ @SalenaZito all you want. We’re friends & disagree often. But her columns are reported and always civil. This is dumb. =>https://twitter.com/SalenaZito/status/1032627858290745344 …
I lean against banning anyone. It's why I purposely never block or mute anyone on Twitter.
-
-
I can respect that. I actually think I follow Ms. Zito on twitter so I wont conflate the two. However
@CNN will have to acknowledge they created the new rules (of banning) and they are going to have to live with those rules. No more double standards. -
This discussion exists beyond CNN. I do think it's a legit discussion to have, altho complicated & good arguments on both side. For instance, my editor at
@dcexaminer won't publish a story I write that is based on fantastical, made up information. IOW, he'd ban such content. -
But who gets to be the arbiter of "fantastical, made up information"? I think the elites whether they are at
@CNN or@dcexaminer have overstepped here. Sooner or later "fake news" or "enemy of the people" outlets will be the target and then it will be too late. -
When you say that 9/11 was an inside job I think you've forfeited some credibility. BUT, I agree w/ you that it's a dilemma because who decides? This is why I err against. BUT like I said, banning occurs all the time, in subtle ways.
-
Agreed it is a dilemma. Thank you for the conversation. Stay awesome. Be Safe.
-
back at ya.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.