Not sure you read that carefully. Trump’s campaign rhetoric, which was hyperbole but qualified, is not equivalent to John Brennan’s false accusation of treason against sitting President. Brennan not entitled to a security clearance in first place.
-
-
-
Says no one ever involved in National Security matters, but you do you Ken.
-
I never said he was entitled to anything nor was I commenting on Trump revoking his clearance. It was more a commentary on a comparison that I think doesn’t hold up all things considered.
-
Odd that the DNI was neither consulted or seemingly aware, one would think that would be the minimum. Also worth noting the date of the original release, they can’t do basic slander correctly.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Lie. He never said that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why has trump been silent on tech giants purging his supporters and the Muslim compound in New Mexico? To be frank it’s eerie he hasn’t said anything about both
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is why he lost his security clearance and why he should have a long time ago.
#michaelhastingshttps://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/12/a-brief-history-of-the-cias-unpunished-spying-on-the-senate/384003/ …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oops is right
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.