Some good stuff here in @SalenaZito's @nypost piece on #OH12:https://nyp.st/2nAOQnO
-
-
I’ve read her stuff. The fact that she “spent time on the ground” and talks to strategists is not evidence or data. I’m calling her analysis made up because it is. If you follow her career she build it entirely off this narrative which all her “analysis” happens to fit.
-
She was entirely unknown before she started going to bat for Trump’s voters and made up the silly seriously/literally paradigm. Then she wrote articles and books all attempting to back up her *own hypothesis* without any actual data. That’s not journalism.
-
I don’t know why you or other journalists like to push her nonsense. Perhaps her counternarrative buys you some “balance” street cred. But it’s ALL based on anecdotes “on the ground” or cherry-picked quotes from “strategists.” And it all is set up to support *her* narrative.
-
I’m not just calling her opinion “off base.” I’m calling her a complete and total fraud. An unknown “journalist” concocts a theory that soft-peddles Trump voters’ racism and suddenly she’s got a career. Now she simply repeats her theory w/o evidence over and over.
-
And your evidence that Trump voters are racist?
-
Oh boy. Google exists dude. I don’t have time to write a book for you.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.