Findings were produced by the Obama-era IC who spied on Trump so they needed to have “findings” that back up their reason for spying. Besides, the “findings” are not hard evidence. They are speculative assumptions made with different levels of certainty including RT programming
-
-
-
Who is crazier: Strzok or
@JohnBrennan? Just note that Brennon - who led the spying on Trump per his own public admission - was CIA Director when CIA “found” that Russia meddled in the election. He “found” this to excuse his political-driven spying. THUG!https://twitter.com/johnbrennan/status/1018885971104985093?s=21 … - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I don’t think he Ever will, for legal reasons, it goes against his self interest, possibly used as a party admission in a collusion indictment. If he never acknowledges that it was Russia this will be a key aspect that would have to be litigated, was it truly Russia who hacked?
-
As long as an official from his executive branch like Rod R. Announces it & endorses he’s likely not negligent in not endorsing. It’s an odd & faulty position to be in b/c if he does it could put him into a box on collusion allegations.
-
I think it puts him in a better position. He could talk about commitment to stop this from happening ever again, in contrast to his predecessor, but keep up offensive on collusion narrative. This would be easy.
-
Maybe publicly, legally it maybe used as party admission of fact that Russia hacked. As of now, that is only an indictment, it has to be litigated. If he admits it’s Russia this may remove major layer of protection & years of litigation having to prove it was in fact Russia, 1st
-
Basically it’s all stupid legal positioning and does not serve the interests of the American people in any way.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What do you expect him to say with Putin standing next to him? Drink some reality man. He's not going to skewer the Russian President in front of the world.
-
He doesn’t seem to mind doing it to the Germans, Canadians or U.K. Presidents.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
When a government agency examines the DNC server I will believe them.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Trump is a complete and utter fool.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yet, nobody seems to answer the Wikileaks proof that the CIA had source code that made hacks appear Russian and Chinese in origin...why? So they could hack and make it look like it was Russian or Chinese (seems obvious)! But, let’s not talk about that...shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Straw men what republicans
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Obama needs to take full responsibility of what took place. stop blaming. Trump the American people are done with the corruption and the lies that are told by the Democratic Party
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you blame him after the IC Strzok included tried to screw him! You have a dubious counter intelligence investigation that may well be an “insurance policy” to derail his presidency!
@POTUS does well to be ambiguous with supporting either narrative!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.