IMO, yes.
Things change. Stories can be accurate at the time they're written, then things change, especially in this WH.
-
-
bear in mind that she also printed that Kelly was calling Trump an idiot all over town and Kelly has said that was bullshit flat out Kelly is lying about hating Bolton and Trump both though, that's the explanation
-
I am not saying she is always right and never wrong. I'm saying she's not making things up and that I find these things believable.
-
every example i've brought up, you've said her version was right, even when it was contradicted by later events. if she's not always right, why is that?
-
I said it was believable but could be wrong, which is different from dishonest, and I've said that conditions change.
-
I don't know a single person who isn't a reporter who thinks that Trump not hiring someone because of a moustache is believable. Not being rude, being completely serious. That is some kind of shared delusion that you guys are operating under, that it sounds remotely plausible
-
I appreciate your views - not rude at all. But just because it's not believable to many doesn't mean it's not true. It rings possible to me. What can I say? But I get where you're coming from.
-
you can justify literally anything by saying that though. how does your editor decide what to print when "well it could be true" is the standard?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Trump woke up one day and decided moustaches are cool, that's the most likely explanation? Not that Maggie Haberman preferred Hillary to win and prints ridiculous stories 24/7 to try to cause problems inside the current administration?
-
With this POTUS, who describes himself as a guy who likes to go w/ his gut, it's absolutely believable.
-
and with this press corps, who have openly said Trump is the enemy not just of them but of everything America stands for, the other possibility isn't believable? I don't think that's an objective examination of the facts
-
Who has said that? I'm sure you can find me some but vast majority never said that even though I'm sure there are biases which I notice just as well as you.
-
you are forgetting the press coverage from election night 2016 if you think it was only a couple of reporters here and there who were saying that youtube has ever major network's coverage, fast forward to about 1 am and listen to what they're saying
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.