Maggie knows what goes on inside the WH.
Maybe you're wrong about Trump, because you don't actually know that she was dishonest vs. wrong - if she was wrong. I tend to think she was right because it make sense that Trump would be influenced by Bolton's appearance.
-
-
so you think that a guy who Trump didn't want to hire, and who John Kelly didn't want hired, and who Pompeo didn't want hired, somehow accidentally made it onto the national security team? ok
-
Things change. Stories can be accurate at the time they're written, then things change, especially in this WH.
-
bear in mind that she also printed that Kelly was calling Trump an idiot all over town and Kelly has said that was bullshit flat out Kelly is lying about hating Bolton and Trump both though, that's the explanation
-
I am not saying she is always right and never wrong. I'm saying she's not making things up and that I find these things believable.
-
every example i've brought up, you've said her version was right, even when it was contradicted by later events. if she's not always right, why is that?
-
I said it was believable but could be wrong, which is different from dishonest, and I've said that conditions change.
-
I don't know a single person who isn't a reporter who thinks that Trump not hiring someone because of a moustache is believable. Not being rude, being completely serious. That is some kind of shared delusion that you guys are operating under, that it sounds remotely plausible
-
I appreciate your views - not rude at all. But just because it's not believable to many doesn't mean it's not true. It rings possible to me. What can I say? But I get where you're coming from.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.