Just catching this - but Bolton being sidelined for the Dear Leader summit doesn't bode well for holding the line on KJU's lies, games & obfuscation. =>>https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1003845874840227840 …
That sounds like honest reporting. I mean it could be wrong but it doesn't sound dishonest. Just because a political operative might say something doesn't mean it's "dishonest."
-
-
printing something you know is wrong is the literal definition of dishonest. i give Maggie credit for not being stupid enough to think that Trump refused to hire someone because of facial hair
-
Maybe you're wrong about Trump, because you don't actually know that she was dishonest vs. wrong - if she was wrong. I tend to think she was right because it make sense that Trump would be influenced by Bolton's appearance.
-
so you think that a guy who Trump didn't want to hire, and who John Kelly didn't want hired, and who Pompeo didn't want hired, somehow accidentally made it onto the national security team? ok
-
Things change. Stories can be accurate at the time they're written, then things change, especially in this WH.
-
bear in mind that she also printed that Kelly was calling Trump an idiot all over town and Kelly has said that was bullshit flat out Kelly is lying about hating Bolton and Trump both though, that's the explanation
-
I am not saying she is always right and never wrong. I'm saying she's not making things up and that I find these things believable.
-
every example i've brought up, you've said her version was right, even when it was contradicted by later events. if she's not always right, why is that?
-
I said it was believable but could be wrong, which is different from dishonest, and I've said that conditions change.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.