Stores have been spending hundreds of thousands per year on new armed security because shoplifting is falling? Sure... checks out.
-
-
produce some actual, verifiable contrary data. I'm just seeing rank speculation or anecdote substituting for real data. (E.g., prove that shop owners are buying more sophisticated anti-theft devices AND that they're doing it because of a rise in losses, and not because it 2/
-
saves them money even given the previous, historically low, rates of theft, which doubtless caused some losses. I mean, even in the recent past, lots of money has been spent on anti-theft devices as better ones become available, even without a surge. Surgies must PROVE such 3/
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.