This is interesting from @DavidLat, but I’m surprised. Did you really write a thinly veiled caricature of a prominent person (and friend) that included so many examples of sexual harassment just by coincidence? Kozinski loved it and thought it accurate. Did that give you pause?https://twitter.com/DavidLat/status/944080669482934272 …
-
-
Replying to @PeterContiBrown
Yes (to Q1) and no (to Q2). What’s actually IN the book (as opposed to hinted at/saved for sequel) isn’t true harassment, just a little “creepy.” And the fact that he liked the book suggested to me he had nothing to hide.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @DavidLat
I’d be interested in others’ thoughts, but given the rigid hierarchy I strongly disagree. Obsessing over a female clerk’s beauty is harassment. You (through Audrey) seemed to have found him a charming cad, but he seems predatory to me.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
I might have calibrated wrong (as a writer), but I meant for the character to go up to - but not cross - the line. I’m too much of a coward/brown-noser to brazenly, knowingly insult someone who was, in 2014, a highly respected, federal appellate judge.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.