Agreed. Or at least, encourages it.
-
-
3. The Polanski character’s actions fall well short of the allegations - Audrey even finds him “charming” - but the ending (pp. 280-81) hints that there could be more below the surface.
-
4. But again, I had no clue my “prediction” would come to pass - just like the death in the book of a brilliant, fiery conservative
#SCOTUS justice, at age 79, predeceasing an older, liberal, cancer-surviving female colleague. -
5. But now, as
@AppellateDaily suggested the other day, I might have more material for a sequel, this time taking place at#SCOTUS....pic.twitter.com/a80GkCVTi6
-
6. The theme I had in mind for the sequel (well before recent events): human beings are complicated creatures, and a “hero” in one context can be a “villain” in another (& vice versa - I was actually planning to redeem the Stinson character).
-
7. The Audrey character - who’s a stand-in for me, as I’ve said before- is a bit naive. And maybe so was I.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.