Friday fun for #appellatetwitter & #SCOTUS types: not a dissental, but an "opinion respecting" denial of en banc: http://bit.ly/2pTX51z
HA! Yup, I noticed that. I do wonder why Judge Hurwitz didn't just concur with the denial (but maybe he didn't vote; abstention = no).
-
-
Abstention correlates with tenor of his "statement" too, which implies he *might* disagree, but not enough for en banc
-
Though really, Hurwitz is never disagreeing with W. Fletcher-Gould.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.