Noteworthy, cc: @DavidLat @WilliamBaude @jadler1969 @joshgerstein @rickhasenhttps://twitter.com/POGOBlog/status/817418634121375745 …
-
-
this is ridiculous metric as it isbased on potus who nominated and home state senator support.
-
Perhaps you can come to its defense as "well tested,"
@AdamSFeldman? -
1/ It's well validated, from a peer-reviewed study, and exogenous to the individual
-
2/ The progenating article has 397 cites on google scholar http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.528.6443&rep=rep1&type=pdf …
-
3/ Performs very well as a generalizable measure of voting ideology in multivariate analyses
-
4\ It cuts across tiers of the federal judiciary and links up with Congress (good for studies)
-
Did you do an analysis of the
#SCOTUS shortlisters' political leanings/ideology - if so, can you point me to that?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yep. That is why for me Sykes>Prior.
@BrianWToth@adamliptak@nytimesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.