How? @clarkd2esq @DavidLat @atlblog @jeffjohnroberts Unless, like the DOJ, the money is used to force an unfair resolution, it's the Court.
-
-
As you know, I'm a litigator. Perhaps a "loser pays" system would help.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yes, but anti-SLAPP solves it: much less money to defend when it's "defamation"
-
I've done SLAPP and it's a slippery beast. Not sure it represents justice.
-
me too (tho from law clerk side). Still cheaper than normal defamation case, no?
-
("normal" as in state without anti-SLAPP law)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.