I'm surprised. Where I was trained up, not carefully reviewing TOC was a screaming offense.https://twitter.com/DavidLat/status/730129372707852288 …
-
-
Replying to @RMFifthCircuit
@RMFifthCircuit Not that there are typos; rather,@BryanAGarner has views on TOC typeface & capitalization that not everyone follows.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @DavidLat
@DavidLat@RMFifthCircuit@BryanAGarner This is the nonsense that makes grant of cert to pro se petitioners so exciting.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AstoriaTom
@AstoriaTom@RMFifthCircuit@BryanAGarner are paying for this kind of anal retentiveness. (2/2)1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DavidLat
@DavidLat@RMFifthCircuit I think@BryanAGarner should be more concerned about BigLaw miscitation to precedent, which destroys credibility.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @AstoriaTom
@AstoriaTom@RMFifthCircuit@BryanAGarner subtler points that even generally effective advocates miss. (2/2)1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @DavidLat
@DavidLat@RMFifthCircuit The article to be written is the power & peevishness of clerks, who just spent 2 years obsessed w/ shit like this.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@AstoriaTom @RMFifthCircuit Exactly! Thanks for remembering discussion of italicized periods in @SCOTUSambitions. Sigh, @LegalBluebook....
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.