@DavidLat @SCOTUSblog wouldnt be surprised to see polarizing figure nominated/rejected first (LL) then a more moderate second choice (Sri)
-
-
-
@maynenic@SCOTUSblog Also - why do you see@LorettaLynch as polarizing#SCOTUS nominee? -
@DavidLat@SCOTUSblog on paper@LorettaLynch confirmation would look worse for GOP (Clinton/Obama ties + 56-43 drawn out confirmation) -
Tweet unavailable
-
@PoliticalTropes which is why Obama should count on 2 nominees:http://goo.gl/RXeAsm
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@DavidLat@atlblog@SCOTUSblog -@LorettaLynch couldn't be any more contentious/partisan than Harriet Miers.. (and she's at least qualified)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DavidLat@SCOTUSblog@LorettaLynch A black woman on the Supreme Court would make me so damn proud to be an American for a minute.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DavidLat agreed. Lynch too polarizing.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DavidLat@SCOTUSblog@LorettaLynch@atlblog lynch nom would show Obama just playing politics. No chance of confirmation.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DavidLat@SCOTUSblog@LorettaLynch I'm with you.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DavidLat@atlblog@SCOTUSblog@LorettaLynch Benghazi will sink her, though she's an interesting choice.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DavidLat@SCOTUSblog@LorettaLynch but think of the optics of the hearing OR refusing to give first African American woman a hearingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.