"Were Justice Thomas to talk, people would listen," writes @adamliptak. #SCOTUShttps://twitter.com/adamliptak/status/694143353080909824 …
-
-
Replying to @DavidLat
@DavidLat@RonColeman@adamliptak yawn, I've read this story a dozen times, you gadflies write it just about every year.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @horse_lawyer
@horse_lawyer@DavidLat@adamliptak I haven't written it ONCE!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RonColeman
.
@RonColeman fair enough! I miss tweeted at you, lazily. I meant to direct at Lat and the lazy NYT crowd1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @horse_lawyer
@horse_lawyer I'm happy to be mistakenly included in their august company1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RonColeman
.
@RonColeman to be fair@DavidLat didn't deserve the mis-tweet either. But 'Thomas doesn't talk ergo not intellectual' crowd makes me crazy1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @horse_lawyer
@horse_lawyer@RonColeman Thanks for clarifying; as I said, I'm a CT fan (& think that if he spoke more, the haters would have to shut up).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@horse_lawyer Well, I do agree with the @AdamLiptak line I quoted: if CT spoke up more, people would listen (& be impressed). #SCOTUS
-
-
Replying to @DavidLat
@DavidLat@adamliptak well, Thanks for the lengthy reparte to clarify, I hereby withdraw my knee jerk criticism and snark, forthwith0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.