An argument in favor of cameras at #SCOTUS: the high price of hiring a line-stander: http://slate.me/1ELjW0G (by @Dahlialithwick & @mjs_DC)
-
-
Replying to @DavidLat
@DavidLat@Dahlialithwick@mjs_DC Got to ask again: would televising the arguments really fix this? Many seem to pay the money to be there.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RichardMRe
@RichardMRe@DavidLat@mjs_DC It wouldn't solve the "problem"—but it would mitigate the travesty of access to justice to the highest bidder.2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @cristianafarias
@cristianafarias@DavidLat@RichardMRe@mjs_DC Access to SCOTUS oral args is not the justice-access travesty we need to be concerned about.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @BruceSBarnett
@brucelaluz @cristianafarias Agreed. I suggest financial incentives for lawyers willing to address the justice gap: http://wapo.st/1c87FH1
8:03 PM - 27 Apr 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.