@Greg651 @rickhasen @JoshMBlackman I empathize. I think she was exaggerating her inebriation for comic effect.
-
-
Replying to @DavidLat
@DavidLat@Greg651@rickhasen She has fallen asleep before, absent vino :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JoshMBlackman
@JoshMBlackman@Greg651@rickhasen There's an argument she shouldn't go in the future to SOTU, but I don't see it as a major breach.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidLat
@JoshMBlackman@Greg651@rickhasen Talking about specific cases, pending or possibly coming to#SCOTUS in future, is much bigger deal.1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @DavidLat
.
@DavidLat@JoshMBlackman@Greg651 Agreed, but does anyone think her vote (or Scalia's) vote would be any different if mouths kept shut?2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen@DavidLat@Greg651 What matters in the cannons of ethics it the appearance of impropriety. Tipping your hand destroys it.4 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @JoshMBlackman
.
@JoshMBlackman@DavidLat@Greg651 I thought the canons don't apply to SCOTUS justices (maybe they should)2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @rickhasen
@rickhasen@DavidLat@Greg651 Alas, the Justices are not bound by any cannons of ethics...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@JoshMBlackman @rickhasen @Greg651 Not bound by canons. Or cannons. But I'd find a cannon pointed at me to be very persuasive authority!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.