Legal question— Is Santa's Naughty/Nice determination subject to judicial review? Asking for a friend.pic.twitter.com/cwKQiuK8NS
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
@DavidLat @JusticeWillett Well, I guess if by "Santa's ok" you mean "Santa's entitled to deference" ...
@RonColeman @DavidLat @JusticeWillett Lump of coal for the naughty certainly not shocking to the judicial conscience or sense of fairness
.@RobRosborough @RonColeman @JusticeWillett Certainly not violative of 8th Amendment proportionality.
@DavidLat @JusticeWillett He's got a significant 14th Amendment issue - discriminating on the basis of religion.
@atlblog @four42two @DavidLat @JusticeWillett Distribution of toys is not establishment or directly support religious activity; is (1/2)
@MattTKinney @atlblog @DavidLat @JusticeWillett but no rational basis to discriminate against all the nice atheist children. #Festivus
@DavidLat @JusticeWillett Which he would had he failed to leave a compy of #SupremeAmbitions under my tree (or Menorah, as it were).
@DavidLat @JusticeWillett It is committed to agency discretion and not subject to review - Cf Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821 (1985)
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.