@jessewegman @AndrewDaar @DavidLat it's the whole sidewalk. If you buy the idea of quiet persuasion (I know you don't) zone bans it
@jessewegman @AndrewDaar I agree w/@adamliptak. I just reread the facts section; this law basically guts an entire type of communication.
-
-
@jessewegman@AndrewDaar@adamliptak I don't think we're going to convince each other. I'll just say I find slip op. at 19-29 persuasive. -
@DavidLat@jessewegman@adamliptak No, but I appreciate the discussion and the civility. -
@AndrewDaar Agreed. Btw when you were escort, did clinic tell you if you could discuss your views on abortion?@jessewegman@adamliptak -
@DavidLat@jessewegman@adamliptak advocated anything to a patient, nor has any escort I work with. -
@AndrewDaar@jessewegman@adamliptak That's smart of you; otherwise raises the exemption/content-neutrality issue. -
@DavidLat@jessewegman@adamliptak (Sorry if that sounded snarky or smug; it was just meant to be an expression of what we see our duty as.) -
@AndrewDaar@jessewegman@adamliptak Using escorts like yourself is another alternative to unconstitutional laws that ban quiet persuasion. -
@DavidLat@jessewegman@adamliptak On the other hand, I think we should aspire to no longer need escorts. I don't believe people should
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.