@JosephPatrice Your article is inaccurate. http://abovethelaw.com/2013/06/scotus-could-strip-blacks-of-rights-and-expand-gay-rights-on-the-same-day/ … Intertribal had ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with #VoterID. @DavidLat
-
-
Replying to @ElectionLawCtr
@ElectionLawCtr@DavidLat Sure, it's not Voter ID like we referred to it during the Elx, but the law req'd voters to produce more dox.2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @JosephPatrice
@JosephPatrice@DavidLat plain error to call it#voterID. Like calling a salmon a submarine as both in ocean.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElectionLawCtr
@ElectionLawCtr@DavidLat You must be getting tired telling NY Times, WaPo, Slate & everyone else about this "error" all of us made1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JosephPatrice
@JosephPatrice@DavidLat I have been. Many have corrected their error as a result. Hope a good site like ATL does too.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElectionLawCtr
@ElectionLawCtr@JosephPatrice: how would you revise this very fleeting reference: "This Term saw a key voter ID law struck down."1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidLat
@DavidLat@JosephPatrice The term of art in the practice is called "citizenship verification." This case has zero relation to#voterid.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@ElectionLawCtr @JosephPatrice: I tweaked that language & added a link to Scalia's opinion (so folks can read for themselves). Thanks!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.