9. But even if one can identify SOME specific snippet of testimony that might be erroneous, and can further show that the defense of the testimony's correctness doesn't hold water, the alleged error must also clearly be (a) important and (b) deliberate.
-
Show this thread
-
10. I respectfully submit that none of the alleged errors in Kavanaugh's testimony meet this standard - at least from the vantage point of a moderate U.S. senator who might cast the deciding vote on his nomination, as opposed to a partisan on either side.
1 reply 3 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
11. Critics of Kavanaugh should focus on his jurisprudence, which liberals and progressives DO have legitimate reason to question, and refrain from attacks on his character, which are not warranted. .
#SCOTUS#KavanaughHearings#KavanaughConfirmationHearings7 replies 10 retweets 35 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @DavidLat
Did you know nothing about Kozinski until December?
1 reply 2 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @KathyHKu
I knew nothing of the allegations. I actually know less than many people about certain situations because people are so tight-lipped around me, fearing I'll blab & blog about them. For more discussion, seehttp://thepolitic.org/an-interview-with-david-lat-legal-scholar-and-author-of-supreme-ambitions/ …
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DavidLat
Did you know about the "Easy Rider Gag List" before the LA Times reported it in 2008?
3 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @ProfEmilyMurphy
Caveat: I lost many emails when I switched cable internet providers after moving from New York to D.C. in 2006. It's possible that maybe one of those lost emails was an email from Kozinski somehow referencing the Gag List. But I do not recall any such email.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DavidLat @ProfEmilyMurphy
So now I'm curious: How did you feel or what did you think about the list and being left off the list (such as it was reported) as a journalist who covered Judge Kozinski pretty closely & had separate email exchanges with him?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @LeahLitman @ProfEmilyMurphy
To be totally honest, I will confess, with embarrassment/shame, that at the time I was miffed about being off the list (especially since the
@WSJLawBlog mentioned journalists were on the list). But today, suffice it to say that I have a different reaction.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Not sure I understand the timeline: a few tweets ago I asked if you knew of the list prior to the 2008 reports. You: "No, not that I can recall," and you looked at your old emails. But you do remember being "miffed," so when (and how) did you learn about it?
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes
To be honest, I can't recall with 100 percent certainty - but when I looked at the @WSJLawBlog post you sent me that mentioned "journalists" being on the list, that did trigger something.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.