7. (This is why perjury has a "materiality" requirement. The supposedly false statement must have "a natural tendency to influence, or [be] capable of influencing, the decision of the decision-making body" in question.)http://bit.ly/2MfbY50
To be totally honest, I will confess, with embarrassment/shame, that at the time I was miffed about being off the list (especially since the @WSJLawBlog mentioned journalists were on the list). But today, suffice it to say that I have a different reaction.
-
-
Not sure I understand the timeline: a few tweets ago I asked if you knew of the list prior to the 2008 reports. You: "No, not that I can recall," and you looked at your old emails. But you do remember being "miffed," so when (and how) did you learn about it?
-
To be honest, I can't recall with 100 percent certainty - but when I looked at the
@WSJLawBlog post you sent me that mentioned "journalists" being on the list, that did trigger something.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.