5. If thousands of smart people around the nation look long and hard enough at anyone's testimony, especially a nominee who testified for dozens of hours at three hearings, they can find - or manufacture - what might look like errors in the testimony.
Caveat: I lost many emails when I switched cable internet providers after moving from New York to D.C. in 2006. It's possible that maybe one of those lost emails was an email from Kozinski somehow referencing the Gag List. But I do not recall any such email.
-
-
So now I'm curious: How did you feel or what did you think about the list and being left off the list (such as it was reported) as a journalist who covered Judge Kozinski pretty closely & had separate email exchanges with him?
-
To be totally honest, I will confess, with embarrassment/shame, that at the time I was miffed about being off the list (especially since the
@WSJLawBlog mentioned journalists were on the list). But today, suffice it to say that I have a different reaction. -
Not sure I understand the timeline: a few tweets ago I asked if you knew of the list prior to the 2008 reports. You: "No, not that I can recall," and you looked at your old emails. But you do remember being "miffed," so when (and how) did you learn about it?
-
To be honest, I can't recall with 100 percent certainty - but when I looked at the
@WSJLawBlog post you sent me that mentioned "journalists" being on the list, that did trigger something.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Now that was quite a lawyerly response. ;)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.