2. But over the past few days, I've received many smart tweets expressing respectful and thoughtful disagreement with my views. I'm grateful for this feedback, and I'm sorry I can't respond to all of it individually.
-
-
Show this thread
-
3. Many of these responses, like my original analyses, take a deep dive into the evidence - reading transcripts more closely, parsing testimony more finely, and bringing up additional evidence. (Lawyers are especially good at this.)
Show this thread -
4. I believe that Kavanaugh's defenders generally have the better of the argument - see my new threads from earlier today, in case you missed them - but even if his critics prevail on a point here or there, there's another issue.
Show this thread -
5. If thousands of smart people around the nation look long and hard enough at anyone's testimony, especially a nominee who testified for dozens of hours at three hearings, they can find - or manufacture - what might look like errors in the testimony.
Show this thread -
6. The issue then becomes, as to any specific alleged error, is the mistake (a) significant and (b) intentional? Or is it, as
@BenjaminWittes puts it, "minor and inadvertent"?https://twitter.com/benjaminwittes/status/1038531832168554497 …Show this thread -
7. (This is why perjury has a "materiality" requirement. The supposedly false statement must have "a natural tendency to influence, or [be] capable of influencing, the decision of the decision-making body" in question.)http://bit.ly/2MfbY50
Show this thread -
8. As I've explained at length, based on reviewing the testimonial and documentary evidence, I believe that Judge Kavanaugh has given truthful, accurate, and complete testimony, on all issues where his testimony has been questioned.
Show this thread -
9. But even if one can identify SOME specific snippet of testimony that might be erroneous, and can further show that the defense of the testimony's correctness doesn't hold water, the alleged error must also clearly be (a) important and (b) deliberate.
Show this thread -
10. I respectfully submit that none of the alleged errors in Kavanaugh's testimony meet this standard - at least from the vantage point of a moderate U.S. senator who might cast the deciding vote on his nomination, as opposed to a partisan on either side.
Show this thread -
11. Critics of Kavanaugh should focus on his jurisprudence, which liberals and progressives DO have legitimate reason to question, and refrain from attacks on his character, which are not warranted. .
#SCOTUS#KavanaughHearings#KavanaughConfirmationHearingsShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
WTF are you talking about?? Perjury?? Huh?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.