It’s kind of amusing (if it weren’t so horrifying) to watch you two desperately trying to rehabilitate Kavanaugh with “yeah but he didn’t *technically* commit perjury.” In most trials, if your closing statement is “but my client didn’t technically commit perjury,” you lost.
-
-
-
Read more carefully. What Kavanaugh said was entirely truthful, and smear to the contrary depends on taking isolated passages out of context.
-
He got obviously stolen materials, and used them. He helped prep judges, then dissembled about it. He worked on a torture program; then said he didn’t. And you’re tying yourself in knots trying to show otherwise. He was only “entirely truthful” if you’re willfully blind.
-
He’s probably gonna get confirmed, because you have the votes. So I’m not sure why you’re even bother justifying it. Embrace the cynicism! It will make your life easier. And you’ll look more honest.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This is all idealogical bs. Whoever in my thread is against abortion, supports K; whoever supports right to abortion, against. Both torture what little we know about K to serve those opinions. Speaking of torture, how about we see the vast amount of info hidden from us?
-
Wait a zillion years until some historian digging through archives finds it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.