Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
DavidLat's profile
David Lat
David Lat
David Lat
Verified account
@DavidLat

Tweets

David LatVerified account

@DavidLat

Lawyer turned writer, editor, and speaker. Founder, Above The Law (@ATLblog) and Underneath Their Robes. Author, Supreme Ambitions: A Novel (@SCOTUSambitions).

New York, NY
bit.ly/DavidLat
Joined April 2008

Tweets

  • © 2018 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. David Lat‏Verified account @DavidLat Sep 6

      1. The key issue here is CONTEXT. The quotations by Kavanaugh that people are fixating on must be read in light of the entire 2004 hearing transcript, which is available here: http://bit.ly/2M3VIUv  - #SCOTUS #KavanaughHearings

      7 replies 83 retweets 273 likes
      Show this thread
    2. David Lat‏Verified account @DavidLat Sep 6

      2. A crucial background fact: at the @WhiteHouse, different lawyers in the Counsel's Office get different circuit courts as their portfolios when it comes to nominations. See, e.g., here (noting Cheryl Stanton handling the 5th Cir.):http://bit.ly/2NTfm7k 

      1 reply 53 retweets 192 likes
      Show this thread
    3. David Lat‏Verified account @DavidLat Sep 6

      3. At Kavanaugh's 2004 hearing (Elie erroneously says it was 2006), in response to Senator Ted Kennedy, Kavanaugh explained that Bill Pryor's 11th Cir. nomination wasn't in Kavanaugh's portfolio: "not... assigned to me,""not one... I worked on personally."pic.twitter.com/slYE251Rsn

      4 replies 53 retweets 209 likes
      Show this thread
    4. David Lat‏Verified account @DavidLat Sep 6

      4. Later in the same colloquy, Kavanaugh restated the point in slightly different words: "the way the work is divvied up, that wasn't one of the ones I" (and then he was cut off, but presumably he would have said something like "assigned" or "given"). #SCOTUSpic.twitter.com/dg6Et7rKOT

      2 replies 49 retweets 187 likes
      Show this thread
    5. David Lat‏Verified account @DavidLat Sep 6

      5. Sandwiched in between these two perfectly clear explanations is the language that @ElieNYC, @nycsouthpaw and others fixate on: "I was not involved in handling [Pryor's] nomination."pic.twitter.com/mIUiYEb2ai

      4 replies 52 retweets 187 likes
      Show this thread
    6. David Lat‏Verified account @DavidLat Sep 6

      6. Yes, Kavanaugh could have been more precise. But read in context, in light of statements he made immediately before & after, it's clear that all he was saying was that the Pryor nom/11th Cir. wasn't under his official @WhiteHouse purview.

      7 replies 67 retweets 283 likes
      Show this thread
    7. David Lat‏Verified account @DavidLat Sep 6

      7. The "not involved" statement that Kavanaugh's critics rip out of context CANNOT be fairly read as a blanket denial of any and all involvement, especially based on other testimony given by Kavanaugh in the very same colloquy.

      8 replies 65 retweets 288 likes
      Show this thread
    8. David Lat‏Verified account @DavidLat Sep 6

      8. Kavanaugh explicitly ADMITTED, for example, that he might have attended a moot session for Pryor, and/or read & discussed news articles about the Pryor nom (but understandably didn't want to go into detail about @WhiteHouse internal deliberations).pic.twitter.com/K9nOo4uf2X

      7 replies 51 retweets 219 likes
      Show this thread
    9. David Lat‏Verified account @DavidLat Sep 6

      9. Even if you want to over-read the "not involved" line, perjury requires specific intent to mislead - which Kavanaugh obviously did not have, having ADMITTED to at least SOME involvement with the Pryor nom.https://www.justice.gov/usam/criminal-resource-manual-1747-elements-perjury-specific-intent …

      11 replies 54 retweets 283 likes
      Show this thread
    10. David Lat‏Verified account @DavidLat Sep 6

      10. So, in conclusion, this "perjury" argument is without merit -- an unfair and unfounded attack against Judge Kavanaugh. Vote against him if you disagree with his jurisprudence, fine -- but please don't slander him. Thanks. #SCOTUS #KavanaughHearings

      90 replies 337 retweets 1,247 likes
      Show this thread
      David Lat‏Verified account @DavidLat Sep 7

      David Lat Retweeted David Lat

      P.S. I have done two additional threads on "perjury" allegations related to #Memogate and NSA surveillance: 1. Memogate: https://twitter.com/DavidLat/status/1037928034224033792 … 2. NSA surveillance:https://twitter.com/DavidLat/status/1038195699513520129 …

      David Lat added,

      David LatVerified account @DavidLat
      THREAD. "Perjury" claims against Judge Brett Kavanaugh re: NSA surveillance. 1. I've done long threads on claims that Kavanaugh "perjured" himself re: Pryor & #Memogate. This thread will be shorter. #SCOTUS #KavanaghHearing #KavanaughConfirmationHearings
      Show this thread
      3:55 PM - 7 Sep 2018
      • 55 Retweets
      • 125 Likes
      • Terracith 👻🇺🇸 watson 🇺🇸👻 Kristen Vander-Plas 🇺🇸🎚K.J. Pritchard ❌ ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ a bear Jason the Weaponiz'd🐻 Security Cameras (((AG))) Persnickety
      27 replies 55 retweets 125 likes
        1. David Lat‏Verified account @DavidLat Sep 8

          David Lat Retweeted David Lat

          P.P.S. More tweets on the "perjury" claims: 3. Pickering: https://twitter.com/DavidLat/status/1038617313933750273 … 4. Addressing "OK, maybe he didn't commit perjury, but wasn't he misleading/incomplete/not totally forthcoming? Shouldn't we demand more for #SCOTUS?"https://twitter.com/DavidLat/status/1038630129025646593 …

          David Lat added,

          David LatVerified account @DavidLat
          THREAD, re: this frequently raised point: "OK, maybe Judge Kavanaugh didn't commit perjury. But wasn't his testimony misleading/incomplete/not totally forthcoming? Shouldn't we demand more for #SCOTUS?" #KavanaughHearings #KavanaughConfirmationHearings
          Show this thread
          7 replies 12 retweets 33 likes
          Show this thread
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Katie MacKenzie‏ @FakeNewsHuntres Sep 7
          Replying to @DavidLat

          Really he’s ok because of semantics? Or it wasn’t really a lie just bad explaining? And he didn’t know he was viewing stolen documents? He just sorta came across a Senator’s email? He has to go he can’t be a Judge and it’s his own fault. Personal responsibility and all that stuff

          0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Tony Glover‏ @GloverLawFL Sep 8
          Replying to @DavidLat

          This context is important for both sides.

          0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. The Cryptokeeper‏ @NYCMandAhole Sep 7
          Replying to @DavidLat

          You do realize your obviously biased statements over the past 4 days completely undermine any credibility you may have had. “David lat said X!” “Well he also said not voting makes you politically independent even when you serve on the DC circuit court directly shaping policy.”

          1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
        3. The Cryptokeeper‏ @NYCMandAhole Sep 7
          Replying to @NYCMandAhole @DavidLat

          It’s almost embarrassing to the post of making Chris Cilizza look like someone to be taken seriously

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. End of conversation
        1. karen gilbert‏ @kgeecupid Sep 8
          Replying to @DavidLat

          Can you .. name one current law that involves men and their bodies

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Buffalo Rome‏ @KeekaburraS Sep 8
          Replying to @DavidLat

          And what Circuit was in his portfolio?

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Gary L Greco‏ @Divotz2 Sep 8
          Replying to @DavidLat @BillKristol

          Your just letting a Supreme Court Justice off the hook for cheating, lying,and ethics are a whole different set of issues, because someone exploited a "glitch" on the server. How do we know they didn't make that glitch? See this smells like a cover up of shitty politics. He lied.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. matt‏ @LegalMaruchana Sep 8
          Replying to @DavidLat @BillKristol

          These threads are mindless gibberish.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Publius‏ @TheFoyeEffect Sep 7
          Replying to @DavidLat

          I never realized until I made law review how often you use signals in your tweets.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. unknown‏ @_weedforce Sep 8
          Replying to @DavidLat

          https://mobile.twitter.com/nycsouthpaw/status/1038569883364147200/photo/1 …

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. B BlueTrue #VoteNOV6th #WhoOwnsKavanaugh?‏ @bbluetrue1 Sep 8
          Replying to @DavidLat

          BullfuckingShit....you want your far right idealogue on the court....He LIED and his hubris made him think he could get away with it.....Fuk you GOP so called Patriots

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. rmc‏ @Thelast_try Sep 8
          Replying to @DavidLat

          rmc Retweeted rmc

          https://twitter.com/thelast_try/status/1038573528197591040?s=21 ….

          rmc added,

          rmc @Thelast_try
          This is the @MerriamWebster definition of 'involved' https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/involved …
          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. rmc‏ @Thelast_try Sep 8
          Replying to @Thelast_try @DavidLat

          He wasn’t being imprecise . He was being evasive

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. End of conversation
        1. Eve Hammond  🌊  ↩️ Special "Councel"‏ @EveHammond13 Sep 8
          Replying to @DavidLat

          what is a nice little cottage industry for you

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2018 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info