Why would a mole be more likely in contentious environment? Senate Judiciary was vastly more polarized than other committees (Armed Services or Banking or others were vastly less so), so idea of a "mole" especially implausible. "Mole" theory here akin to Assange lies re DNC hack.
There's some additional context for the contentious environment on the Hill in the early 2000s (which may actually support the idea of a "mole" instead of "hacking," which to that extent helps Kavanaugh). My bottom line is perjury is a high bar.
-
-
-
This is exactly right..
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Misleading congress and using stolen info should disbar a guy from being a judge. As you know you couldn't be hired as an AUSA with that in your background but ymmv
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.